Two walks, both graded moderate. One is a six-mile circuit on good paths through Derbyshire dales, with a pub at the end. The other is a six-mile haul across pathless Welsh bog with 700 metres of climbing and no obvious way off the hillside. Same word, very different days out.
Trail grades are shorthand, not a promise. They're written by different publishers for different audiences, and they assume a walker who may be fitter or slower than you. Here's what the labels tend to mean in the UK, and how to work out whether a route suits you.
Most walking in Britain is graded by one of three loose systems, and they don't always agree with each other.
Long-distance paths such as the Pennine Way or Offa's Dyke Path aren't graded as a whole, because a single day of them varies enormously. Read the day-by-day notes instead.
Easy generally means a short day — under five or six miles — with modest ascent, often less than 200 metres, on paths that are obvious or waymarked. You shouldn't need a map to find your way, though carrying one is never a bad idea.
Easy is not the same as flat, paved or pushchair-friendly. Plenty of easy routes are muddy, stony and full of stiles and gates. An easy valley walk in the Lake District can still mean two hours on a rough track.
A useful test: could you finish it in trainers after a wet week, in daylight, with a phone map and no particular hill fitness? If yes, it's easy in practice.
Moderate is the broadest and least helpful label in the UK. It usually signals six to ten miles, perhaps 300 to 600 metres of ascent, some rougher ground, and four to six hours of walking including stops. You'll probably need to read a map at least once.
The trouble is that moderate is where publishers put everything that isn't a stroll and isn't a mountain epic. A gentle ridge in the Cheviots and a rocky traverse in Snowdonia can both carry the word.
When you see moderate, ask three questions:
Hard — or strenuous, or severe — covers three quite different kinds of difficulty, and they don't always arrive together.
Add bad weather and a hard route becomes something else again. Wind and rain on an exposed ridge can turn a straightforward summer walk into a real test of nerve and kit. If a description says "hands on rock", "not for those who dislike exposure" or "navigation skills essential", believe it.
Grades are adjectives; numbers are facts. Two figures will tell you more about a route than any label.
The first is total ascent. On UK hills, metres climbed matter more than miles walked. A rough working rule — Naismith's Rule, used by walkers for over a century — allows one hour per five kilometres on the flat, plus one hour for every 600 metres of ascent, then adds time for stops and steep descents. It badly underestimates bog and boulder fields, but it's a reasonable starting point.
The second is underfoot conditions. A mile of tarmac lane takes fifteen minutes. A mile of tussocky bog can take forty. Boardwalk, forest track and a well-drained fell path are quick; heather, scree and wet peat are slow. Guidebook times usually assume a fit walker moving steadily and rarely stopping to look at the view.
The most reliable gauge isn't a grade at all. It's the last walk you did.
If you have a heart condition, joint problems or another ongoing health concern, it's worth speaking to your GP before taking on noticeably harder days.
Treat the grade as the beginning of your research, not the end of it. Look at the ascent figure and the contour lines, read the route description properly, check the weather and the daylight hours, and pick a turnaround time you'll actually stick to.
Carry a map and compass you can use, a headtorch, waterproofs, and enough food and water for the day. Tell someone where you're going and when you expect to be back. Then the label matters much less, because you'll be making your own judgement on the ground.
Photo: GregMontani / Pixabay